The complainant, a self-represented party in a family law matter, alleged that the judge was rude, disrespectful, verbally abusive, and discriminated against her because she was a self-represented litigant

20060001 - The complainant, a self-represented party in a family law matter, alleged that the judge was rude, disrespectful, verbally abusive, and discriminated against her because she was a self-represented litigant

The matter was closed because the allegations were unfounded. A review of the case showed that the complainant repeatedly interrupted the judge and was evasive in answering the judge’s questions. While a transcript is not always the best record, as it does not show a person’s tone and demeanor when speaking, it did not support the complainant’s allegations. The judge did interrupt at times, but it was necessary to ensure orderly proceedings. The judge adhered to the principle set out in Ethical Principles for Judges: “While acting decisively, maintaining firm control of the process and ensuring expedition, judges should treat everyone before the court with appropriate courtesy.