Atlantic Courts Education Seminar for Federally Appointed Judges
The seminar began with an overview of recent Supreme Court of Canada and appellate cases in criminal, family, and civil law. A family law and a valuation expert then delved into the legal intricacies of financial statements in family and other matters. Other sessions explored the following issues: what cognitive science can teach judges about judgment writing, and the nature of microaggressions and how they can be addressed. The program continued by focusing on the following topics: how to organize complex trials in criminal and family matters; challenges judges encounter when navigating and assessing social media evidence; myths and preconceptions about people living in poverty, barriers between individuals living in poverty and the judicial system, as well as how courts can lessen barriers and avoid re-traumatizing individuals experiencing poverty; issues surrounding judicial privilege when judges cross the Canadian border. The seminar concluded with a discussion about best practices when conducting alternative dispute resolution proceedings, and an interactive presentation on the psychological mechanisms which underpin procrastination, and best practices to avoid it.
Number of Participants: 94
Overview
This program focused on a variety of substantive, skills-based, and social context topics relevant to superior court and appellate judges across Atlantic Canada. Sessions included a combination of presentations, panel discussions, and interactive group conversations led by senior judges, multi disciplinary academics, professionals, and representatives from the local community.
Objectives
The objectives of this program were to: (1) enhance practical skills related to judgment writing, managing complex trials, conducting alternative dispute resolution proceedings, and addressing procrastination; (2) increase substantive knowledge in the areas of digital evidence, financial statements and judicial privilege when crossing the Canadian border and; (3) develop awareness of the social context around microaggressions and how poverty and trauma impact individuals’ interaction with the justice system.
Summary
The seminar began with an overview of recent Supreme Court of Canada and appellate cases in criminal, family, and civil law. A family law and a valuation expert then delved into the legal intricacies of financial statements in family and other matters. Other sessions explored the following issues: what cognitive science can teach judges about judgment writing, and the nature of microaggressions and how they can be addressed.
The program continued by focusing on the following topics: how to organize complex trials in criminal and family matters; challenges judges encounter when navigating and assessing social media evidence; myths and preconceptions about people living in poverty, barriers between individuals living in poverty and the judicial system, as well as how courts can lessen barriers and avoid re-traumatizing individuals experiencing poverty; issues surrounding judicial privilege when judges cross the Canadian border. The seminar concluded with a discussion about best practices when conducting alternative dispute resolution proceedings, and an interactive presentation on the psychological mechanisms which underpin procrastination, and best practices to avoid it.