The complainant alleges that the judges presiding the matter disregarded court rules, failed to penalize the opposing party for perjury, and made unfair decisions.

20170012 - The complainant alleges that the judges presiding the matter disregarded court rules, failed to penalize the opposing party for perjury, and made unfair decisions.

It is not for the Council to review the judicial decision-making process or the manner in which judges exercise their judicial discretion in the conduct of a case. This includes, amongst other things, the judges’ legal and procedural decisions as well as their assessment of the evidence. In such situations, the best course of action for judicial decision-making cases is an appellate review and not the filing of a complaint with the council. It was determined that this matter does not warrant further consideration by the Council.